[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: Open Access -- [SOAF] Open letter to Congress from 25 Nobel Laureates]

Liebe Listenteilnehmer(innen),


Einen schoenen Abend!
Katja Mruck

FQS - Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung
/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research (ISSN 1438-5627)
English -> http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
German -> http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs.htm
Spanish -> http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-s.htm

Please sign the Budapest Open Access Initiative:

Directory of Open Access Journals:

Open Access News:
Return-path: <owner-american-scientist-open-access-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envelope-to: mruck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:22:42 +0200
Received: by Mail.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE (Exim 4.42) from
  magazine-archive.sigmaxi.org ([]
  helo=w2k-server1.workgroup.sigmaxi.org) for mruck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  with esmtp id <1C1sfp-01zrHU-MQ>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:22:41 +0200
Received: from listserver ([]) by
  w2k-server1.workgroup.sigmaxi.org with Microsoft
  SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:22:41 -0400
  (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 194398 for
  AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 30
  Aug 2004 16:23:51 -0400
Received: from by LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG (SMTPL release
  1.0d) with TCP; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:23:50 -0400
Received: by mailserver2.workgroup.sigmaxi.org with Internet Mail
  Service (5.5.2657.72) id <RS54PFZN>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:22:34 -0400
Received: from raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([]) by
  mailserver.sigmaxi.org with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
  Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id RMHD71BX; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:22:18
Received: from magpie.ecs.soton.ac.uk (magpie.ecs.soton.ac.uk
  []) by raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP
  id i7UKMGgg007428 for
  <american-scientist-open-access-forum@xxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004
  21:22:16 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pandora (pandora []) by
  magpie.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06992 for
  <american-scientist-open-access-forum@xxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004
  21:22:15 +0100 (BST)
X-Received: from crow.ecs.soton.ac.uk (crow.ecs.soton.ac.uk
  []) by roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3) with
  ESMTP id i7UDdOLC006418; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:39:24 +0100
X-Received: from arl.org (mx2.arl.org []) by
  crow.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7UDdAZA013645;
  Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:39:10 +0100 (BST)
X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.0.3
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:SPARC-OAForum-off@xxxxxxx>
List-ID: <SPARC-OAForum.arl.org>
List-Archive: <https://arl.org:443/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/List.html>
Precedence: list
X-Original-Message-Id: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean, Found to be
X-ECS-SpamScore: s
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
ReSent-Subject: [SOAF] Open letter to Congress from 25 Nobel Laureates
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for
  more information
X-MailScanner-From: harnad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Approved-By: Stevan Harnad <harnad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <list-3370211@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:22:10 +0100
Reply-To: SPARC Open Access Forum <SPARC-OAForum@xxxxxxx>
Sender: American Scientist Open Access Forum
From: Peter Suber <peters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [SOAF] Open letter to Congress from 25 Nobel Laureates
Comments: To: AmSci Forum
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2004 20:22:41.0060 (UTC)
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.99d.1
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain

An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress
Signed by 25 Nobel Prize Winners

August 26, 2004

Dear Members of Congress:

As scientists and Nobel laureates, we are writing today to express our
strong support for the House Appropriations Committee's recent direction
to NIH to develop an open, taxpayer access policy requiring that a
complete electronic text of any manuscript reporting work supported by
NIH grants or contracts be supplied to the National Library of
Medicine's PubMed Central.   We believe the time is now for all Members
of Congress to support this enlightened policy.

Science is the measure of the human race's progress.  As scientists and
taxpayers too, we therefore object to barriers that hinder, delay or
block the spread of scientific knowledge supported by federal tax
dollars  including our own works.

Thanks to the Internet, today the American people have access to several
billion pages of information, frequently about disease and medical
conditions.  However, the published results of NIH-supported medical
research for which they already have paid are all too often inaccessible
to taxpayers.

When a woman goes online to find what treatment options are available to
battle breast cancer, the cutting-edge, peer-reviewed research remains
behind a high-fee barrier.  Families looking to read clinical trial
updates for a loved one with Huntington's disease search in vain
because they do not have a journal subscription.  Libraries, physicians,
health care workers, students, researchers and thousands of academic
institutions and companies are hindered by the costs and delays in
making research widely accessible.

There's no question, open access truly expands shared knowledge across
scientific fields -- it is the best path for accelerating
multi-disciplinary breakthroughs in research.

Journal subscriptions can be prohibitively expensive.  In the single
field of biology, journals average around $1,400 and the price is almost
double that in chemistry.  These already-high prices are rising fast,
far in excess of inflation and the growth of library budgets.  An
individual who cannot obtain access to a journal in a library may buy
copies of solo articles they need, but that can cost them $30 or more
for each article.

The National Institutes of Health has the means today to promote open
access to taxpayer-funded research  through the National Library of
Medicine.  If the proposal put forth in the House of Representatives is
adopted, NIH grantees may be expected to provide to the Library an
electronic copy of the final version of all manuscripts accepted for
publication, after peer review, in legitimate medical and scientific
journals.  At the time of publication, NIH would make these reports
freely available to all through their digital library archive, PubMed
Central (PMC).

There is widespread acknowledgement that the current model for
scientific publishing is failing us.  An increase in the volume of
research output, rising prices and static library budgets mean that
libraries are struggling to purchase subscriptions to all the scientific
journals needed.

Open access, however, will not mean the end of medical and scientific
journals at all.  They will continue to exercise peer-review over
submitted papers as the basis for deciding which papers to accept for
publication, just as they do now.

In addition, since open access will apply only to NIH-funded research;
journals will still contain significant numbers of articles not covered
by this requirement and other articles and commentary invaluable to the
science community.  Journals will continue to be the hallmark of
achievement in scientific research, and we will depend on them.

The trend towards open access is gaining momentum.  Japan, France and
the United Kingdom are beginning to establish their own digital
repositories for sharing content with NIH's PubMed Central.  Free access
to taxpayer funded research globally may soon be within grasp, and make
possible the freer flow of medical knowledge that strengthens our
capacity to find cures and to improve lives.

As the undersigned Nobel Laureates, we are committed to open access.  We
ask Congress and NIH to ensure that all taxpayers get their money's
worth.  Our investment in scientific research is not well served by a
process that limits taxpayer access instead of expanding it.  We
specifically ask you to support the House Appropriations Committee
language as well as NIH leadership in adopting this long overdue reform.

Signed by Twenty Five Nobel Laureates

Name, Category of Nobel Prize Awarded, Year

Peter Agre, Chemistry, 2003
Sidney Altman, Chemistry, 1989
Paul Berg, Chemistry, 1980
Michael Bishop, Physiology or Medicine, 1989
Baruch Blumberg, Physiology or Medicine, 1976
Gunter Blobel, Physiology or Medicine, 1999
Paul Boyer, Chemistry, 1997
Sydney Brenner, Physiology or Medicine, 2002
Johann Deisenhofer, Chemistry, 1988
Edmond Fischer, Physiology or Medicine, 1992
Paul Greengard, Physiology or Medicine, 2000
Leland Hartwell, Physiology or Medicine, 2001
Robert Horvitz, Physiology or Medicine, 2002
Eric Kandel, Physiology or Medicine, 2000
Arthur Kornberg, Physiology or Medicine, 1959
Roderick MacKinnon, Chemistry, 2003
Kary Mullis, Chemistry, 1993
Ferid Murad, Physiology or Medicine, 1998
Joseph Murray, Physiology or Medicine, 1990
Marshall Nirenberg, Physiology or Medicine, 1968
Stanley Prusiner, Physiology or Medicine, 1997
Richard Roberts, Physiology or Medicine, 1993
Hamilton Smith, Physiology or Medicine, 1978
Harold Varmus, Physiology or Medicine, 1989
James Watson, Physiology or Medicine, 1962

Press Contact:
Dr. Richard J. Roberts
(Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine,1993)
Tel: (978) 927-3382
Fax: (978) 921-1527
Email: roberts@xxxxxxx

Listeninformationen unter http://www.inetbib.de.